Let's play a game called 'wank word'.
Sarcs,
You nailed it. The Doc's writing style is as identifiable as Flyingfiends writing style. Here are some 'word' examples of what Mr Skull supposedly wrote in
his statements:
- embrace this
- robust criticism
- tendentiously self-serving and frequently false accusations about, and the vindictive public disparagement
- it impugns
- demagogic vitriol behind the facade of a pointed evaluatory critique
- denigrate,vilify
- 'not hearsay and tautological rubbish
Yeah right. Now here is some of the wording that Doc 'Emmet Brown' likes to use. It is from one of those speaches he gives where you wish you were watching paint dry or cutting your own wrists:
"For the purposes of developing a clearer, more accurate theoretical understanding of the dynamic nature of the common law tradition, this, too, may constitute a preferable analytical perspective, and for the purposes of fostering a genuinely constructive understanding of the perenial and seemingly intractable issues having to do with the relationship between law and custom in the Pacific Islands today, the adoption of such a perspective may well provide the best approach to a functional understanding of the common law tradition".
Hmmm
.One could assume that the angry man and the expert on PNG voodoo dolls have morphed into one? But how could that be? by way of a magic trick, smoke n mirors, occult or magic practise?
And a blast from the past. The Beaker and Doc's take on accident investigations and Accidental Justice. A most interesting and robust read, but yes, it is filled with some tautological rubbish:
http://www.casa.gov.au/wcmswr/_assets/main/lib100059/sep-oct11.pdf