PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 3rd Dec 2012, 18:53
  #3213 (permalink)  
Engines
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LO and others,

I think that Rand were tasked to do a study into USAF tanker configuration options - worth looking for.

I believe the conclusion was that it would be effective to swap smaller tactical aircraft over to probe and drogue and leave boom refuelling for large aircraft, but I am very prepared to be proved wrong.

What I do know is that replacing the A's boom receptacle with a retractable probe (as per B and C) would save a lot of weight (around 200 pounds plus) and give back a good amount of fuel (over 400 pounds). That's good numbers for a tactical fighter bomber.

Best Regards as ever

Engines
Engines is offline