PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 3rd Dec 2012, 09:08
  #3207 (permalink)  
ORAC
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,438
Received 1,597 Likes on 733 Posts
Why is it so important to have AAR for the ship-based F-35 then ?
The F-35B has a combat radius of 450nm on internal fuel. Assume the carrier has to stand-off shore at 200nm to avoid land based anti-ship missiles, such as the C-802, then the effective range against a land based target will be 250nm.

That severely limits the system capability against any land-locked country or large country such as Iraq, Libya or Afghanistan - to name only the last 3 in which we have conducted operations.

And that ignores the advantages in both time and numbers in being able to to airborne alert as opposed to GCAS etc.

Last edited by ORAC; 3rd Dec 2012 at 09:09.
ORAC is offline