PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Anti-ice below -40 sat
View Single Post
Old 29th November 2012 | 12:59
  #7 (permalink)  
RAT 5
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 4
From: last time I looked I was still here.
The term 'descent' IMHO is misleading. Most planned continuos descents are done at idle. The flameout protection is much less than at high power. Also the introduction of heated air at idle power has less effect on engine power & efficiency. However, IMHO, if you are doing a short descent in say V/S 1000fpm and thus at about 80% of CRZ power you should not need EAI if >-40SAT and in cloud. You are using what would be a CRZ power for a lower FL even though you are descending. It a debatable point, but one where I believe the thinking pilot can read between the lines of the Boeing SOP and understand the reason for what they wrote and adjust their operation with airmanship.
RAT 5 is offline  
Reply