TT,
Careful what you say - all comments on Pprune, while not necessarily attributable to a particular individual, are available for public/commercial view.
It is not unknown fro developers or councillors to come across Pprune and use views expressed here - genuine or facetious - as representative of the entire aviation community.
So it might be better to say:
It has come to a sorry state where the council can't find anywhere better for travellers than a working airfield with extremely poor infrastructure which will mean inadequate healthcare, education, water and sewerage for some of the most deserving people in our community.
Then we know exactly what you mean.
Our perhaps criticise the council because the only site in the entire county they can find for some of the least fortunate people in our midst is one which would lead to the loss of scarce private sector aviation-related jobs - which cannot be easily relocated - and would have inadequate healthcare, education, water and sewerage for some of the most deserving people in our community.
I am sure that if the council really cared for the less fortunate of their constituents, they would have taken the trouble to find a better site.
And if they really care about job creation and preservation, they would not be supporting this development.