So the only thing wrong with the Bernoulli explanation is the flawed concept of equal transit times to explain why the air should accelerate over the top of the wing.
But the Newton explanation doesn't actually explain this either.
If you want something to travel in anything other than a straight line you must apply a force to it - what is the force that makes the air follow the wing?
Coanda is an effect, not a force and was first noticed during WW1 when observing the smoke from the guns and engines of the old fighters as it tracked round the fuselage so it isn't new.
I don't have the right answer - I'm neither a physicist nor a mathematician but Bernoulli (apart from equal transit time which I don't think was part of his theorem anyway) seems to be the closest to explaining all the observable phenomena.
The pretty picture of the downwash over the fog bank is fine but the vertical penetration of that downwash is limited - is there really enough air moving downwards at enough of a rate to hold up a multi-ton jet??
At least with a helicopter downwash you can see a column of air being displaced downwards (and feel its effects if you are underneath it)to balance the mass of the aircraft