Hi Mr Purdey,
I'm still looking for that answer to your question, I hope to have it in the next few days.
My point this time is that whilst I agree we are going around in circles a little bit, does the fact that two sides can read the same information, and reach a totally different viewpoint, not indicate that there is an element of doubt?
The (actual) facts are not sufficient for everyone to reach the same conclusion.
A little simplistic, maybe, but in it's rawest form, that is what this whole campaign is all about. The case has not been proved with absolutely no doubt whatsoever.
Regards
Brian
"Justice has no expiry date" - John Cook