In my opinion, it is very rapidly approaching the point that someone, i.e. the CAA CEO, needs to be stepping up in front of a Westminster Committee to explain what is going on.
Why?
Confusion about Annex II, Language, What is/isn't Aerial Work, IR(R) etc
The CAA, in only the way that the CAA can, has jumped into EASA transition with both feet and sunk.
Other, perhaps more refined and less arrogant authorities, have chosen to wait a bit to fully prepare for the transition.
But as long as there is that 2 min message at the beginning of every phone call to the CAA about 'bullying and threatening behaviour will not be tolerated and calls will be terminated' everything will be fine.
If the CAA was more customer focused instead of inward-facing and self-centred, then the customers wouldn't get annoyed with it.
It is currently bollox!
