PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - CAA v FAA approach to 'Low Flying' Regs
View Single Post
Old 21st Jan 2003, 12:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Heliport
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow CAA v FAA approach to 'Low Flying' Regs

The FAA recognises that helicopters can land virtually anywhere if the need arises. Accordingly, the FAA ‘Minimum Safe Altitudes’ regulations distinguish between helicopters and other aircraft.
FAR 91.119
”Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:
(a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.
(b) Over congested areas. (1000’ rule)
(c) Over other than congested areas. (500’ rule)
(d) Helicopters. Helicopters may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section if the operation is conducted without hazard to persons or property on the surface. In addition, each person operating a helicopter shall comply with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the Administrator."

(The safety provision in Section (a) applies to all aircraft, including helicopters.)

Do you think such an exemption should be included in the new UK Rule 5?

Notes:
  • The Poll is intended to obtain the views of UK helicopter pilots.
  • The views and experience of FAA helicopter pilots would be very welcome.

Heliport

Last edited by Heliport; 21st Jan 2003 at 22:47.
Heliport is offline