No Sig
I too was going to "leave it at that" but you have now also got my back up. So I will explain.
'I would suggest there are others that are unhappy but will not comment as they are "known".
If you had actually read my previous posts you would understand what I meant. But I'll explain again in the context it was meant, out of your 20 or so Easyjet students taking this course, if you actually asked them "off the record" what they thought of the course you might be surprised, Yes possible retribution. As you so rightly pointed out, some are novices and any of your staff not complying with your standard and also "happen to be a bit of a PPRUNE'r" are hardly likely to speak out if they are "known" to you. Nothing sinister intended, I was just asking you to maybe accept there is room for improvement.
On the same hand, if your staff all thought this was the all singing all dancing course you say it is, why don't they defend it. In fact why does no-one defend it other than yourself. I also accept maybe there are no other "Pruner's" that are taking htis course that are reading this thread, but your 3-0 down at present. Get all your happy staff to sign up and post on here.
"No one is passing the buck on anything- I have said from the begining your are students of the GCNS and of course you must contact them directly."
I refer the honerable gentleman to the answer I gave earlier about the function of a course moderator. As I said earlier, GCNS are not, as far as I'm concerned, qualified to present this course or be blamed for its content. "hence the reason you were brought in". Quality of reproduction etc can be attributed to them but a course moderator is responsible for the content, in the same way a moderator moderates these forums. I'm still awaiting a letter from GCNS with the results of your moderators meeting (without going back to find it, I think you said the 7th of Jan). That's almost two weeks ago. I believe you told your students at Easyjet that module one contained some overkill. I still haven't had anything like that from GCNS. Or is that information just for Easyjet students and the rest of us are kept in the dark ??
Alas I digress, this isn't the reason I am responding.
I too am disappointed in you sir
"I am now begining to wonder what your agenda is FG with comments like that"
Go back and read what I have said all along and I'll tell you my agenda.
I want an accurate course, a good standard at a fair price and not feel ripped off. At the moment I feel I am being ripped off along with 50 or so other people. All I am saying and have said all along, not enough time has been put into the quality or the checking of the course material. Three people have taken the trouble to point out their feelings but you have ducked and dived all the way through in true politician style.
I accept we obviously come from varying backgrounds regarding operations, but that brings up the whole point again of how far this course should go with regard "relevant" material. It all boils down to interpretation and what you feel the job is. I have noted all along you only respond to items in my posts that you feel you can put up an arguement and by pass the rest - a true politician.
My post before last took me hours to prepare and to try and get my points across but you hardly addressed any of them. If I wanted to give you a few lines and just say the course is s**t, I could have done, but I have tried to give you honest opinion of what I consider to be wrong. Others have agreed, I accept only three have complained on here, but no-one has supported you.
I haven't asked for the course to be scrapped, far from it, I have said all along the idea is commendable and welcomed. But there are too many errors in its current form. It needs looking at.
as you said earlier lets not degenerate further.
regards
FG