One of the most absurd aspects of the stopover is that it is virtually a misnomer now; yes, there are - because of the "one for one" rule, a fair number of flights still flying between DUB and SNN, but what is most objectionable (and illogical) is the linkage between the two. Why should DUB be held back and why should a market of 100k be expected to match demand in a market of 1m?
I have no great objection to a smaller number of routes being required, but independent of Dublin; let it grow to matc its potential which (when the current crisis has blown over) will clearly be significant.
So, why does it remain in place? Why isn't this question being addressed? It seems that there is a significant body of opinion in the west which cares more about what Dublin gets than what it can cater for. Dog in a manger attitudes, if you will . . .