Originally Posted by
Lyman
Ordinarily, your case would be persuasive, but BEA leave the entire product in doubt, imo.
How? By not printing a remark from the crew that was once alleged by the press and therefore may not have been accurate?
Look - if we combine the more colourful language used in the book with the CVR transcript in the report, I think it's fair to say you've got probably 98% of the total CVR content in the two, and if you use the book to determine language that the BEA omitted it quickly becomes apparent that only non-pertinent language was omitted (as the report itself makes clear).