PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - EASA (=More Hours at Work)
View Single Post
Old 2nd Oct 2012, 17:03
  #15 (permalink)  
Discorde
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 16 Posts
Bear in mind that many air passengers will chose the cheapest fare options, regardless of the competence of the operators to provide a safe service (and fatigued pilots are, of course, less competent than non-fatigued pilots when we define 'fatigue' as 'debilitating tiredness'). It's a form of negative lottery: 'We only paid £30 and the chances of us getting to destination are very very good.' Air transport has, in a way, become a victim of its own success in achieving very high standards of safety. Passengers assume – with statistical justification – that their chances of being an air accident victim are vanishingly small. It is unlikely that this point of view can be changed unless a series of serious accidents were shown to be the result of fatigue-induced crew error.

You can predict the response of whichever politician is lumbered with the damage limitation PR exercise after a fatigue-related prang. It's answer #12 in the Government PR Media Briefing Document:

'Our thoughts are with the families of the victims. We will hold a full and thorough enquiry to find out the causes of this terrible accident and take action to make sure it never happens again.'
Discorde is offline