Glide Slope
Attack, attack, attack. Seems that some PPruners are only happy when on the defensive. Too bad we can't discuss items without the attacks.
Cough : That was my understanding when they were trying to develop the MLS system many years ago.
FlightpathOBN : Don't shoot the messenger. I am quoting from the Airbus CFIT manual. Due to many landing accidents in the past, research shows the 3 to 3.7 degree slope to be the best angles for large jet transport. That does not mean that some chart producers won't produce charts with less than 3 degrees. It's just not as safe as the larger angles, obviously. Airbus spent millions of $$ to develop the FPA system which I thought was the best invention in years. Instead of dragging the aircraft in on final with high power at 2.8 deg, why not fly down the slope at a more comfortable 3 deg. with more clearance from obstacles? Safety first.
I don't understand your bravo-nav statement. Please explain.
Why does the USA no longer have a MLS system? Again please explain.
Safetypee. What type of aircraft uses the 5.5 deg slope ?
AND PLEASE, NO MORE ATTACKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!