PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Norfolk Island Ditching ATSB Report - ?
View Single Post
Old 5th Sep 2012, 08:45
  #216 (permalink)  
john62
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: australia
Age: 61
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the WW was not RVSM compliant then wouldn't that suggest that extra fuel be taken in case higher levels were not available?
You would have thought so. Instead, the thinking may have been to be light enough to reach 390 if unable to operate at RVSM levels. We don't know this was the underlying intent during the flight planning, but this was what transpired. They requested to go above RVSM instead of below due to fuel burn, and they were capable of reaching 390 (possibly because not full fuel).

After 3 years how did this not find its way into the report?
john62 is offline