PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Norfolk Island Ditching ATSB Report - ?
View Single Post
Old 5th Sep 2012, 05:23
  #211 (permalink)  
john62
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: australia
Age: 61
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No RVSM

ATSB Pel-Air report excluded critical fuel factor | Plane Talking

No RVSM!!!

This raises a plausible explanation for not taking full fuel. He had to get to FL390 soon after departure, and he had 6 POB. Could a WW do this with full fuel? Or did he need to go light on the fuel to comply?.

When told to descend from 350 to 270 he instead requested 390 due fuel consumption.

The alternative presumably would have been to plan full fuel and cruise below RVSM, with a higher fuel cost.
john62 is offline