PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - 250 kts below 10000?
View Single Post
Old 4th Sep 2012, 06:53
  #20 (permalink)  
de facto
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Irishpilot talked about a higher rate of climb to cruise altitude at 250kts. Thats not accurate. Best rate of climb will be above 250kts in most airliners. If you want to save gas in a 737 you accelerate low (ie 1000ft) and you accelerate to best rate (about 280kts). You'll save about 10kg by accelerating NADP2 instead of NADP 1 and you'll save about 25kg by going straight to best rate. (Boeing info as best as I can recall).
SR 22 talked about cost index flying resulting in low climb speeds anyway..... Thats not accurate. Cost index zero will give you the least fuel burn, which is the best rate, which is well above 250 kits .
If you really want to be efficient you'll depart with the least flap possible and accelerate to best rate of climb as low as you can. There will obviously be slight adjustments for head and tail winds but that's the guts of it.
Agree,just that CI does not account for winds during climb and descent.The ECON speed is a speed where from the start of the climb segment to a point into the cruise segment,the cost of fuel and time cost is minimized.
To save a tad more,max rate speed can be used,a speed dependent on weight.
Accelerating early (800ft) NDP2 will obviously reduce fuel burn as drag is reduced earlier and speed increased.

Last edited by de facto; 7th Sep 2012 at 05:08.
de facto is offline