Mutt;
Precisely my point! If GEP has nothing he can add to the record, why post? Anything else is merely a tease in my opinion. A case of "I know something, but sorry I can't say more."
DX Wombat wrote;
Sooty, did it ever occur to you that maybe GEP is not permitted to provide answers? Maybe he is required by a Court of Law to refrain from such activities, as further discussion on specific points may prejudice the outcome of any legal action undertaken now or in the future.
I assume you are referring to sub judice. Confirming or otherwise that an individual has been arrested will not prejudice any proceedings - the fact, or otherwise, is a matter of record.
I find your demands for answers highly suggestive of aggressive journalism and therefore very worrying.
Well I'm sorry you feel that way Wombat. I am not a journalist, and for the record I applaud the general principle behind GEP's work; it's just the way he is now reporting his progress that I don't much care for.