Originally Posted by Mr Optimistic
This sidestick visibility thing is all well and good but I do not understand why the cpt didn't at least ASK the pf what he was doing never mind instruct him as to control inputs. There were enough pax behind him, situation didn't need one more.
As soon as the captain is back, the stall warning quits. For him a stall has been properly exited. He has no clue the stall warning can quit for other reasons than a stall exit. The Airbus documentation makes absolutely no mention of anything like it, and on the contrary it is specified that a stall warning won’t stop before a stall is actually exited, which follows both regulation and logic.
This stall warning thing puts everything up side down for the captain ability to properly evaluate the situation.
What do you want him to instruct if he cannot make sense himself of the situation ?
But it is a remarkable that the captain would need to ask the PF what he was doing, just because the sidestick concept deprives him to naturally know about the inputs made on the flight control commands.