PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF 447 Thread No. 10
View Single Post
Old 22nd Aug 2012, 13:58
  #24 (permalink)  
HazelNuts39
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: France - mostly
Age: 84
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CONF iture
If the system had that humility to further switch to Direct law when the UAS was detected, AF447 was an all different game with a probable landing in CDG.
What were the PF's targets, and why would they have been different in direct law? EDIT:: Would direct law have prevented these targets to be achieved? Would there have been less "mayonnaise stirring"? Would direct law have prevented full sidestick deflection?

Last edited by HazelNuts39; 22nd Aug 2012 at 15:05.
HazelNuts39 is offline