Wuh:
your assertions have not been tested in Court, from what I understand.
Indeed, and that is, I think, the very point that tuc is making. Evidence laid before 2 judicial reviews, the civil police and the RAF Provost Marshal, amongst others. Result, zilch, not even an interview. The only thing we have been told is that evidently they are "honourable men", whatever that might mean. No-one is suggesting that the full vigour of the law should not be brought to bear on those committing fraud, theft, or indeed any other crime. The point is that it should be brought to bear be they high or low, isn't it?