MRH90 quick reaction capability
On-line availability of the MRH90 might realistically not be any better than 50 percent. If 6 of 46 are nominally for Navy, then only 3 would be available for fleet support roles. If the type can only be operated from the LHDs and LSD(A) (see post #323 by tiger73), then general fleet support and especially boarding party capabilities from other fleet warships will be forfeited because the MH-60R is not suited.
Broadening the discussion a bit. Amphibious operations involving large platforms have historically been sluggish activities necessitating very detailed planning, although perhaps to a lesser extent since the advent of helicopters than when landing craft were solely employed. Nevertheless, aircraft carrier platforms cannot be quickly put to sea as has been trumpeted by the politicians and DoD for natural disaster and humanitarian assistance purposes, nor especially for their primary military functions. They are not a quick reaction capability.
The MRH90 is presumed not to be air deployable by C-130 and any potential difficulties with preparation for airlift by C-17 and reconfiguration at destination seem not to have been publicly aired to date. Whereas the Iroquois could be prepared for C-130 airlift in less than one hour and flyable at destination within that time-frame, there will now be a diminished ADF quick reaction response capability if utility helos are totally shed and the medium lift MRH90 acquisition fully proceeds. Long range ferry of the MRH90 for regional operations will be pretty costly due to higher operating costs.
The smallish ADF would arguably have been better equipped for quick reaction amphibious support operations with several JHSV rather than LPD and LSD(A). See: The USA’s JHSV Fast Catamaran Ships. Maybe the hangar could accommodate 2 x MRH90 with manual blade fold!
Last edited by Bushranger 71; 10th Aug 2012 at 23:00.
Reason: grammar