Originally Posted by
HazelNuts39
No, it is not, but who said it was, and does it matter?
It matters if someone tries to claim that there was a direct limit on autotrim movement in Normal Law that was taken away when degrading to Alternate...
To inhibit a direct control surface limit implies that something that could have still functioned despite the degradation was nevertheless taken away, whereas inhibiting an entire external system that relied on data that was no longer reliable is a perfectly reasonable design decision.