Wouldn't it be better, in your response, to focus on the actual problem for your airfield, i.e. the prevention of use of it as a result of placing pylons across/close to the runway, rather than getting bogged down in endless wider arguments about the economics of wind energy etc? Surely you have a strong case that this new pylon line shouldn't be put in a place where your and others' legitimate use of the airfield is denied?
NS