Originally Posted by
CONF iture
Quit mind reading now
I'm not mind-reading, I'm asking you to answer an honest question. Do you want to see Airbus go back to yokes? You don't have to explain why if you don't want to.
That was the BEA job to analyse the operation and the influence of the THS ...
Which they did.
Originally Posted by BEA Final Report (English) p.22-23
At 2 h 10 min 51, the stall warning triggered again, in a continuous manner. The thrust levers were positioned in the TO/GA detent and the PF made nose-up inputs. The recorded angle of attack, of around 6 degrees at the triggering of the stall warning, continued to increase. The trimmable horizontal stabilizer (THS) began a nose-up movement and moved from 3 to 13 degrees pitch-up in about 1 minute and remained in the latter position until the end of the flight.
That's a factual account of the THS behaviour - and the limit of what the BEA can say.