Originally Posted by RR NDB
UAS was never realized in F-GZCP
Hi,
Why Airbus SAS design delegates to the crew UAS diagnosis?
Why Airbus SAS design allow "garbage" to be processed?
Why Airbus SAS design presents to the crew, during crisis, conflicting information?
All this is for:
1)Fault tolerance and graceful degradation?
2)Critical operation and ACCELERATED degradation?
Why not to inform the crew IMEDIATELY and PRECISELY UAS BEFORE triggering a complex situation like the cascade of events we had in F-GZCP?
On UAS early warning: Technically speaking this is VERY EASY.
UAS is considered an "insider information" ?
I've already said my piece on this, .....and I'll repeat it. Everybody in this Godforsaken business eventually hides behind the law that places final responsibility in the pilots hands. It's easier to escape responsibility when you can blame the dead guys.