Originally Posted by
RetiredF4
The warning was valid, however it was not presented to the crew in the apropriate long time frame due to the iced pitots.
I'm not disputing that, I was simply simply stating that in my admittedly limited experience we had a similar transient warning without iced-over pitot tubes (which are not part of the sim logic). The behaviour uncovered by the BEA certainly warrants looking at from a technical viewpoint
Nevertheless it does not alter the fact that it appears the crew did not respond in the correct manner to either the transient or sustained stall warnings, instead keeping the nose up.