Dozy, I appreciate what jc is doing. What I see jc presenting is the kind of argumentation that a lawyer will use on an ignorant jury to get a large settlement.
I expect that AF's defense will be a reasonable one, as their counsel will show that they had begun to replace the Thales probes, and that this hull wasn't one of the ones YET refitted.
How the jury is played will influence how harshly the jury will perceive AF's schedule and intention to comply with the formal directive ...
Last edited by Lonewolf_50; 30th Jul 2012 at 22:11.