(c) the flight does not involve training or flight testing, and is not a scenic flight; and
(d) the aircraft:
What is a 'scenic flight'? How can a flight so designated be the subject of a regulatory sanction, when everyone's looking at the scenery anyway? Does the purpose of so framing it (the reg.) merely imply that the warbird operator must not refer to flights as being 'scenic' in his advertising? And if so, how crazy is that?