Originally Posted by betterfromabove
The downside to starting to discuss a specific on PPRUNE of course is that you risk plunging into the details before too long
How is that a downside? Without details it is not possible to get a full and accurate picture of what actually occurred. When details change significantly and there is a reluctance to provide them in the first pace, it appears as if there is an attempt to leave an impression of what occurred that is not quite in accordance with what actually happened.
This thread is also a good example of how critical thinking and reading often goes out the window when there is an opportunity to have biases confirmed.