Clandestino...
"Maybe it's just me, but when someone counters to spectacularly wrong theory with some solid facts disproving it, least I expect it would mean the end of that particular direction of discussion."
No solid facts were in evidence, merely a retort that a shaker had on occasion been ignored. Further, even BEA had trouble identifying Buffet and had to with accelerometer data from DFDR.
The dispensation you reference is what is galling. Do you honestly think the shaker would have been without possible benefit on 447?
The 330 in this case showed signs of Buffet only two seconds after the SW fired.
You are without doubt an expert, and I admire and respect your knowledge. Your personality is of no concern to me, I actually enjoy your posturing and preening. I expect that in a good pilot.