Oh Creamy I'm not picking on you per se, it is just that you have this knack (almost six sense) of knowing how and why the regulator will react to almost any given situation...you'd be a formidable opponent if you were batting for the other side!
but you can’t be bothered to have an argument with the people who actually made the decision in accordance with the law.
Are you talking about the AAT or the regulator?
Did the licence fairy just pop a CPL under Mr Q’s pillow?
Maybe the licence fairy doesn't have to!!
Ok if we put JQ's case aside as some kind of aberration, I think I've worked out why CAR 269 was amended in August 2003 and it's that smart bloke McKeown that shines the light:
This interesting 48 page judgement of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal can be viewed online.
Repacholi and Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2003] AATA 573 (18 June 2003)
Yes that dreaded name that continues to reverberate down the halls of Fort Fumble....yep that mad bloke Repacholi!!
By the way McKeown also has an interesting take on CAR 269 (1) (d), but I'll save that for Ron!
