Perhaps he is saying, just because it's law doesn't make it a good law?
Bad law should be objected to in the most agressive manner.
aerobatic flight contrary to CAR 155(1)(c);
o aerobatic flight below 3,000 feet contrary to CAR 155(3)(a); and
o low flying contrary to CAR 157(1)(b).
I would like to see any example of aerobatic flight in a Robinson helicopter at any altitude, (ignoring the criminally doctored utube video), especially negative manouvers, which would result in a tailstrike. Further I would argue that it is legal to fly low, if you are going to land, (haven't seen one stuck up there yet).
On the JQ matter, I note there was no proffered recorded data despite the accused being read his rights and advised the interview was being taped.
Was there something incriminating in the tape that necessitated it become lost/ destroyed or disappeared? Happens quiet regularly. I know from personal experience.