.
via Towering Q #264;
I have yet to complete all 49 pages of the Global Warming Policy Foundation Report number 4, so I cannot tell you what the GWPF would like Australia to do.
Towering Q, how goes the reading? Now that yer probably getting a bit conversant with the IPCC 'discusion' (via the GWPF report) you could probably help De_flieger find some 'proof'..
Towering Q, De_flieger used NASA as a 'proof' though if yer have a look-see yer will note the NASA source of info for the linked page of evidence is...
The following are the key sources of data and informationcontained on this page:
- IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Summary for Policymakers.
-IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Technical Summary.
- NOAA Paleoclimatology.
Climate Change: Evidence
Towering Q, dont yer wonder why NASA scientists and astronauts went to the extraordinary step of sending this letter -
April 10, 2012;
"...49 former NASA scientists and astronauts sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden last week admonishing the agency for it’s role in advocating a high degree of certainty that man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change while neglecting empirical evidence that calls the theory into question.
The group, which includes seven Apollo astronauts and two former directors of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, are dismayed over the failure of NASA, and specifically the Goddard Institute For Space Studies (GISS), to make an objective assessment of all available scientific data on climate change. They charge that NASA is relying too heavily on complex climate models that have proven scientifically inadequate in predicting climate only one or two decades in advance..."
Hansen and Schmidt of NASA GISS under fire for climate stance: Engineers, scientists, astronauts ask NASA administration to look at empirical evidence rather than climate models | Watts Up With That?
.