Ooh, snarky!
Got something for everyone there, Clandestino?
What was presented as 'stall recovery training' was just what I wrote about, reacting to the first indication of a stall. That might be part of the problem, not going any further than that, showing, indeed, inability to differentiate between approach to stall and stall itself.
What works okay for recovery from an approach to a stall might not work for recovery from a stall itself. It seems to be that people want to keep things simple, perhaps a bit too simple?