Lets have a look-see
...
via De_flieger #302;
...With NASA, ExxonMobil and Shell all in agreement, is that enough evidence for you?...
I'm a bit bemused by yer thought proccess ther
De_flieger. Why do you think that "with NASA, ExxonMobil and Shell all in agreement" suddenly we got 'enough evidence'..
...ah can see why
Towering Q is -
Houston, we have a problem...
April 10, 2012;
"...49 former NASA scientists and astronauts sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden last week admonishing the agency for it’s role in advocating a high degree of certainty that man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change while neglecting empirical evidence that calls the theory into question.
The group, which includes seven Apollo astronauts and two former directors of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, are dismayed over the failure of NASA, and specifically the Goddard Institute For Space Studies (GISS), to make an objective assessment of all available scientific data on climate change. They charge that NASA is relying too heavily on complex climate models that have proven scientifically inadequate in predicting climate only one or two decades in advance..."
Hansen and Schmidt of NASA GISS under fire for climate stance: Engineers, scientists, astronauts ask NASA administration to look at empirical evidence rather than climate models | Watts Up With That?
De_flieger, do yer really wanna use NASA as yer scientific 'proof' ? shorely yer got somethin better...
If yer do no problemo, we'll go thru yer link point by point...
via De_flieger #303; ...the money goes round in a circle and nothing is gained...
No, due to our higher costs the money goes to China.
.