Re
Overall paradigm shift" in design and training.
Pariès expands paradigm shift elsewhere as “the change from safety through conformity, to safety through variation management”. Variation is described by Hollnagel:-
http://ipac.ca/documents/The_resilie...ion%5B1%5D.pdf
"…
other pilot would see the inappropriate control deflection and take over"
I doubt that there would be a fair range of data to support either view, but anecdotal evidence suggests that pilots don’t ‘see’ a control input as inappropriate, particularly where both have similar but erroneous situation awareness. Aspect of this are discussed in
http://www.pprune.org/safety-crm-qa-...ervention.html.
In addition, it would be poor practice to train pilots to use an input as a measure of aircraft control, where the really important aspect is the output - what the aircraft is doing – what has the control input achieved.