Originally Posted by
NeoFit
If the conclusions of the 447 HFG are of the same order as that of the Tarom thesis (sponsored by the bea), then, obviously, I wait for nothing of 447 HFG
Why?
An objective view of the evidence - even going back to 1988 - proves conclusively that BEA did *nothing* to protect or shield Airbus, and all accusations of such behaviour were lies concocted by the defence team of M. Asseline and those who followed him.