Sorry, coming back too late!
My previous post # 1296
Bubbers44
None of my hundreds of students died by pulling up in a stall.
Rethink your 80% theory.
And sevenstrokeroll
I agree with bubbers.
Please, would you try to understand what I am trying to say
Lyman , Machinbird and Organfreak
Thanks a lot understanding my post.
Even if I wrote in a previous message <<stupid pilots >>Â, notice that quotes are very important.
(and -please - obviously replace this in the context)
In fact, pilots never understood the vessel was stalled.
' we have engine thrust ! '
In fact, the vessel, with 13 degrees THS NU, was ' parachuted '.
For me, Tarom report raised very important points (As QF72, Perpignan ...).
Did you read Tarom BEAs report?
In its analysis of this accident, the commission has been led to note deficiencies in the effectiveness of the display to the flight crew of the various active modes, the references used, actions in progress and targets pursued with regard to the Autopilot devices, notably in the vertical plane. Most particularly, in the opinion of the commission, the total information presented is inadequate in terms of its likelihood of alerting a crew, who at a given moment have an incorrect mental picture of the state of the automatic devices.
In practice, a good number of observations made by the commission apply to one degree or another to all new-generation aircraft
Consequently, the commission recommends that for all new-generation aircraft:
- consideration should be given by the competent authorities and organizations with a view to improving, in a standardized fashion on an international basis, the presentation and the symbols for displays and information relating to the different Autopilot active modes, notably in the vertical plane.
[/I]
HN39
Your graphic is very interesting.
It recalls me <<Owain Glyndwr - THS Equivalent Elevator Angle>>
(sorry, I am not able to put the link at this time)
Regards