I suppose I’d ask a different question: If CASA does not have a sufficient combination of resources, expertise and strategic resource-allocation management flexibility to stop a person like this, before an innocent person is killed, when CASA has a mountain of evidence (much of it generated by CASA) to support constraint of this person’s activities, shouldn’t someone be alerting the public of that fact?
The 2008 Senate Inquiry covered concerns regarding the move to self regulation. I believe the CEO made clear to employees that he didn't want complaints from industry either.