..... it no longer mentions the word or the fact NPAS stands for saving money.
I think everyone and anyone in the know had realised that NPAS was not going to save any money,
and looked like it was going to cost MORE for the same service that was provided pre-NPAS,
even with the "savings" of scrapping nine airframes.
How do things stand now then, with all those Police Chiefs and Police Authorities - who only ever agreed to join NPAS "in principle" ?
The principle WAS that that joining NPAS would save money, and provide a more efficient service ?
If NPAS are now admitting that there won't be any savings, do the Police Chiefs & Police Authorities get to reconsider
their earlier "in principle" agreement, or are they just going to bend over and take it ( so to speak ),
when Mr. Herbert forces it through anyway, regardless of whether the end result will be more expensive AND less efficient ???
Do the NPAS documents still mention anything at all about providing an improved or more efficient service ?
The whole thing stinks.
