HC
I am sure that you are right, in fact I am surprised it doesn't exist yet because the S92 must surely be pretty close to having its certification pulled due to obvious non-compliance with the certification rules.
Not sure why you would make such a comment, as clearly the FAA/JAA felt that the S-92A was compliant with FAR/JAR 29.927(c) (1) when they certified it and still do, as it still has a ticket.
But the 225 will probably have 10 years head start on 30 mins run dry, which is relevant to those crews flying the aircraft for those 10 years but will eventually become irrelevant.
Are you suggesting that the EC225 is going to get a ‘30-minute Run-Dry’ transmission (something it currently does not have, as was evident just last month)?