PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Aviation Survey Discussion
View Single Post
Old 5th Jun 2012, 10:10
  #61 (permalink)  
blow.n.gasket
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: australia
Age: 74
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Direct wrote:

Steve, I can't remember where I read it but there is an engagement figure below which staff are effectively actively working against a company's interests.

It would be interesting to find that figure and compare it to these results. The flight ops numbers, particularly amongst flight crew who control the company's biggest cost (fuel), were appalling.


Message from the Chief Pilot - 2012 Engagement Survey results (04/06/2012)

The last 18 months have been difficult and this was reflected in Flight Operations’ 2012 Engagement Survey results. Fewer Flight Operations employees responded to the survey (48 per cent compared to 64 per cent in 2011) and overall engagement is lower.
Our results show that for Flight Crew, engagement is at 26 per cent (down 12 per cent from 2011). However engagement among Flight Operations Ground Staff is higher at 74 per cent, bringing the engagement score for Flight Operations overall to 38 per cent, down seven per cent on last year and 28 per cent below Qantas as a whole.
Among Flight Crew, we have seen declines in all question categories that can be compared to last year, and declines in all question categories compared to Qantas overall. The most significant gaps between Flight Crew and the Qantas average are in the areas of overall engagement, communication, Qantas values & behaviour, customer experience and competitive position.
In the context of the past 12-18 months, a decline in engagement was not unexpected. A high-level analysis of the results and your comments suggests that you are disengaged with organisation-led aspects such as leadership and strategy but more engaged with the ‘individual’ aspects of your work such as training, reward and working with your colleagues.
Overwhelmingly, you have told us that you are dissatisfied with the strategic direction of the company and I recognise your disappointment in the breakdown of respect between senior management and Flight Crew. It is clear that rebuilding the relationship between the organisation and our pilots is of the highest importance.
More than 900 Flight Crew (43 per cent) responded to the survey, and we have received thousands of written comments. We are working through the results including your comments, and will be in a position to share more at the mid-year Flight Crew Briefings. We will also use the briefings to talk about what we can all do to work more constructively together.
In the meantime, I would like to thank those of you who participated in the survey. The results do not paint a pretty picture for Flight Operations, but providing your feedback gives us a starting point for rebuilding our relationship with you.

Chief Pilot

Does not bode well for Qantas when you see engagement figures like this from front line operation staff.
Have Qantas done a risk analysis on such low engagement levels for such important staff as pilots?
I wonder what this sort of result does to the Companys risk levels from an insurance point of view?

If anyone can find any interesting links to this stuff would be very handy.
Does this help Steve?

Employee Engagement

A Leading Indicator of Financial Performance

The world's top-performing organizations understand that employee engagement is a force that drives performance outcomes. In the best organizations, engagement is more than a human resources initiative -- it is a strategic foundation for the way they do business.
Research by Gallup and others shows that engaged employees are more productive. They are more profitable, more customer-focused, safer, and more likely to withstand temptations to leave. The best-performing companies know that an employee engagement improvement strategy linked to the achievement of corporate goals will help them win in the marketplace.
Our Value
A Proven Approach and Interventions
Gallup supports organizations to systematically improve employee engagement using proven interventions at the local and enterprise level. Beyond setting the proper strategy, this process includes finding the right performance metrics that drive accountability, creating a comprehensive communication strategy, and designing development opportunities for every employee, manager, and leader.
What is your organization's ratio of engaged to not engaged employees?

Gallup's engagement ratio is a macro-level indicator of an organization's health that allows executives to track the proportion of engaged to actively disengaged employees.
  • In world-class organizations, the ratio of engaged to actively disengaged employees is 9.57:1.
  • In average organizations, the ratio of engaged to actively disengaged employees is 1.83:1.
Actively disengaged employees erode an organization's bottom line while breaking the spirits of colleagues in the process. Within the U.S. workforce, Gallup estimates this cost to be more than $300 billion in lost productivity alone. In stark contrast, world-class organizations with an engagement ratio near 8:1 have built a sustainable model using our approach. As organizations move toward this benchmark, they greatly reduce the negative impact of actively disengaged employees while unleashing the organization's potential for rapid growth.
Gallup's Research-Based Approach
Gallup's employee engagement work is based on more than 30 years of in-depth behavioral economic research involving more than 17 million employees. This research has appeared in prestigious business and scientific publications, including the Journal of Applied Psychology and the Harvard Business Review, and in our bestselling books First, Break All the Rules and 12: The Elements of Great Managing. Through rigorous research, we have identified 12 core elements -- the Q12 -- that link powerfully to key business outcomes. These 12 statements emerged as those that best predict employee and workgroup performance.
Linking Employee Engagement to Critical Business Outcomes
Gallup's latest meta-analysis (an analysis of data from more than 152 organizations) shows dramatic differences between top- and bottom-quartile workgroups on key business outcomes. Beyond the significant differences engaged workgroups show in productivity, profitability, safety incidents, and absenteeism versus disengaged workgroups, we have proven that engaged organizations have 3.9 times the earnings per share (EPS) growth rate compared to organizations with lower engagement in their same industry.
Proven Return on Investment
Increasing employee engagement correlates directly with a positive impact on key business metrics. A partnership with Gallup enables your organization to design, implement, and execute an employee engagement strategy. At the same time, your organization will gain concrete evidence of the impact of this strategy on the bottom line. Gallup's proof of ROI goes beyond the case-study level. By continually validating the effect of increasing employee engagement through meta-analyses and business impact studies, we can observe trends across hundreds of clients. The observed net gain in key business outcomes for work units that grow employee engagement provides a direct linkage to ROI.
Gallup's approach blends strategic analysis with practical steps and advice to change how leaders view their work, their employees, and their customers.

Last edited by blow.n.gasket; 5th Jun 2012 at 10:33.
blow.n.gasket is offline