@Flyinheavy:
If this is really written in the final report, then one could read between the lines, that those who criticized the SS layout sound more credible now, even in the eyes of BEA.
Indeed. IMHO, that would be great. The key words are your beginning ones-- for information of this type, source is everything. This is an unknown source with absolutely no bonafides. We really don't know what the source is or where it came from. Tempting as it may be to draw conclusions, I'm taking this "report" with less than a grain of salt.
Let's take a month off and wait. (For Thread #s 9, 10, 11, etc.)
