Originally Posted by 555orange
Thanks Seenit all. There you go.
Thanks Chuck. Precisely. It was more fair to spread out the pie instead of give it all to EK. Skiing is sore about it and thinks its all market protection and ideology and theory. A conflict in itself. Lol. Now he's just taking an opposing positions everything with no substance as he argues from a position of weakness. Hence his response to AC being a public company, for eg. Regressing. So really it's not much of a debate. Arguing for the sake of arguing is no argument at all.
Anger has nothing to do with it Skiing. Are you sensitive on the topic? I just enjoy the debate. I know where I stand on it, and your entitled to yours too. You want emirates to have more flights to Canada right? And it's aaall about market protection... And the next day Qatar gets more rights. So... Right-... Next.
This debate is not on theory or ideology. But the fact that you believe so says everything.
Sore? Not really. Disagree with Canada's position? Yes.
Would I like to see more flights to Canada? Sure. So would Air France and Singapore. Maybe Westjet too since they benefit from onward connections.
So, 555, if this not about protecting AC but, in fact, about what is best for Canada/Canadians, perhaps you could tell me how more access would be harmful? Can you detail what sectors of the Canadian economy would be negatively impacted and to what extent? What would be the negative impact on individual Canadians?
Since the debate isn't theoretical, you obviously have irrefutable facts to support your side. I am looking forward to hearing them.
In the mean time, as you so generously have allowed, I will maintain my position on this.