I would agree.....it is a solution to an almost non existant problem.
Claret, out of the 45 18 were overturned, so a fair number like your friend.
0.02 is barely a thereputic limit and only designed to take up the slack of inaccuracy's in equipment. Remember this whole thing came about by an over reaction to a less than thereaputic dose of weed at Hammo. (had a cone 3 months previous or something so stupid).
Frank, I think you will find that this was not the case, it was the night before, not much sleep, weed and booze the night before, rushed schedule, not enough food and water etc. It is many years since I read the report but at the time I recall it being a bit more severe than you state, and in my opinion, while I think the DAMP is a waste of money, the Hammo prang almost justifies it alone.......I said almost OK!
