PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - AF 447 Thread No. 8
View Single Post
Old 29th May 2012, 03:58
  #965 (permalink)  
Lyman
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Grassy Valley
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A great deal has been made of the vigorous stick inputs. As an example, it in itself is tolerated. When pumping controls is not trained out, and the possibility for sensitive controls result from a controls process, (direct), can we see the potential for disaster? I am not convinced that enhanced training would improve the situation, especially when it involves a syllabus of counter intuitive process, along with a need for memory items that are arcane, and not conducive to simplicity in the face of panic...

Vsyn... Nice, but it treats the symptoms only. Eliminating failure is impossible, and in that sense, makes the issue more dangerous, and compelling. For example, had UAS been trained as a potential problem, and solutions provided, the accident may not have occurred. Something else to fail, and in its promised safety, eliminates the need to train for its failure, and then one is truly screwed, having not trained for duff speeds.....

Last edited by Lyman; 29th May 2012 at 04:04.
Lyman is offline