Hi again. Thanks for the reply. Yes, stuck on "O".
Still, I think worthy of a discussion, since we read of overspeeds rarely, and it is not our job to approve/disapprove of data written into the public record...
See, here I read those who have taken BEA data/releases, etc. and extrapolated, into areas of conclusive and passionate affirmations that not even BEA ventures. Partisans. I have no such allegiance, and if any of what I express serves to help keep the discussion going, I say fine, BEA need no defense/help, etc. The conclusions I read here belong to those who remain anonymous, along with the bile, anger, and humor, since BEA have none, as yet. Am I biased? Completely.
But then, I said so, and have repeated it often enough to earn immunity from further claims of that which I admit! My bias also reposes in the direction of what is true, in the end. Who cares, really, if Lyman doubts anything? Or believes it?