ihg I am having difficulty understanding you in part because of your tortured use of the english language. Your last sentence includes a marvellous double negative. You spell the same word differently in successive sentences. You use the word reception (the place I have been using the WLAN between flights) when I am pretty sure you mean perception. I could go on, but I will try and use restraint. It is indeed a blessing that you do not wish to lecture us on english grammar. You also put words in inverted commas that I have not used as if you were quoting me. None of this adds to your credibility.
The last poster has put his hypothesis much more compellingly. Although it would be interesting to know if he thinks smoke goggles may have complicated matters. From the picture there does not seem to be too much obvious damage other than the nose cone and gear of course. Anyone in the know?