PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - No cats and flaps ...... back to F35B?
View Single Post
Old 16th May 2012, 20:03
  #892 (permalink)  
kbrockman
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the magical land of beer and chocolates
Age: 53
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B vs C vs A

Engines,

Aren't they also all rated for differing max G loads ,because of these different weights, structural strengths and wing area ?

I always find it baffling if we compare the navalized F35, the C, versus one of its competitors , the navalized RAFALE.
The F35C weighs a whopping 5500lbs more than its brother, the A version, while the weight difference between the landbased and seabased RAFALE is less than a 1000lbs.
All this while the RAFALE M is rated for almost an identical flight envelope than the RAFALE C, ie 9G/ -3.6G with a similar lifetime expectancy (10.000hrs/5000 cycles re. Thales numbers, before it was 7000/3500 acc to the AdlA)
The F35 however is limited to 7.5G as a C vs 9G as an A.


strange.

.

edit, LO, I was writing while you posted, seems like we where having a similar brainfarth.

Last edited by kbrockman; 16th May 2012 at 20:12.
kbrockman is offline